SEO rewards publishing often. Regulation rewards publishing carefully.
Most firms resolve that tension by publishing almost nothing, and then wonder why a competitor with a worse proposition outranks them. Glide does search work for FCA-regulated firms written to the approval route rather than against it. One monthly retainer from £1,000 plus VAT.
Where the six months goes
A generalist agency proposes twelve pieces of content a quarter. At a regulated firm, each one goes to an approver who has a day job, comes back with changes, gets rewritten by someone who does not know why the change was asked for, and goes back again. Two of the twelve publish. The agency reports on the two and the firm concludes SEO does not work in financial services.
Nothing in that story is a ranking problem. The content was never the constraint and neither was the budget. The constraint was that the work was written by people who had never read the rulebook, so every piece needed a second pass that a compliant first draft would not have needed.
Write it to the standard first and the approval step stops being a bottleneck. That is most of the advantage, and it is unglamorous enough that almost nobody sells it.
What changes when the agency knows the rules
Balance is designed in, not bolted on
A promotion has to be fair, clear and not misleading, and risk cannot be buried under the benefit. Writing that in from the first draft reads better than retrofitting a warning box, and it survives the approval route intact.
Consumer Duty shapes the page, not just the policy
Consumer understanding is an outcome you have to be able to evidence. A page written at the reading level your client really has is both better marketing and part of the evidence, which is a rare case of the two pulling the same way.
Claims are sourced before they are written
Past performance, comparisons, superlatives and anything with a number attached get checked at the drafting stage, because that is where a change is free. After publication it costs an approval cycle.
Structure does the ranking work
Where the copy has limited room to manoeuvre, the technical side carries more of the load: indexation, internal linking, schema, service-level pages and speed. None of it needs sign-off, and most regulated sites have never had it done.
Square 4 Partners, an FCA regulatory compliance consultancy, is where the numbers come from. Average Google position moved from 28 to 14 and held there for nine months, on 843,000 impressions and 18,200 organic clicks over sixteen months.
We also run compliant Google Ads for them, including Google's verification for financial services advertisers, which is where a lot of regulated firms get stuck before a single click is bought.
The Glide Retainer, from £1,000/mo
Website, hosting, the search and AI-search foundations and compliance-aware marketing in one monthly fee. A heavier ongoing SEO campaign for genuinely competitive terms is priced separately, from £1,000 a month on top.
See pricingFinancial services SEO, answered
Because search rewards publishing often and regulation rewards publishing carefully, and most firms resolve that by publishing almost nothing. The site goes up, the approval route makes the next change painful, and three years later nothing has been added. It is rarely a technical problem. It is a process problem that looks like a technical one.
A great deal of it is. A financial promotion is an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity, and that catches far more of a normal marketing site than firms expect: service pages, landing pages, most of a blog that mentions what you do. Treating the whole site as in scope from the start is cheaper than discovering it page by page.
That is the job. We write to the standard first so what reaches your approver is designed to pass, and we expect to be told when it does not. What we will not do is hold your permissions or sign anything off. The regulatory duty stays with your firm, and any agency that implies otherwise is selling you a problem.
Three to six months for meaningful ranking change in most of these markets, and longer where a national brand or a comparison site occupies the terms. Square 4 Partners moved from an average position of 28 to 14 and held it for nine months, which gives a realistic shape: the move is not a spike, and holding it is the harder half.
Increasingly, and the risk cuts both ways. A model summarising your sector can describe your service inaccurately to a prospective client with no page of yours involved. Being the clearest, best-structured source on the questions your buyers ask is how you influence that, and it is the same work that earns a featured snippet.
Yes. This work is national and most of it happens over a screen share. The Essex pages on this site exist because local search is a separate discipline with separate terms, not because the regulated work is regional.
SEO for a specific regulated sector
The rulebook changes by sector, and so does the search behaviour. These go deeper on one.
SEO for accountancy practices
Businesses looking for an accountant search a small, predictable set of terms. Most practice websites are invisible for every one of them.
SEO for financial advisers and IFAs
You cannot outrank the national comparison sites on head terms, and you do not need to. The winnable ground is local plus specialism.
SEO for mortgage and protection brokers
Rate moves drive search demand in bursts. Ranking is what lets you catch a burst instead of paying for it.
SEO for fintech firms
Fintech search is half category creation and half AI answer engines. Both reward being the clearest explanation, not the loudest brand.
Need the site built as well as ranked? Financial services website design covers the build. For the whole picture, see marketing for regulated firms.
Want to rank without creating a compliance problem?
Tell us what you're working on
Fill in the form and tell us what you're trying to achieve, who you're going after and what you can spend. Mike reads every one and comes back with a straight answer on whether we can help.
Tell us about your projectTakes two minutes. No calls, no diary tennis. A reply within one working day.